P09 — Menulis dan Menerbitkan di Jurnal Bereputasi

Learning Pathways / KurikulumCurriculum / P09

P09 · Kurikulum pesertaParticipant curriculum

Menulis dan Menerbitkan di Jurnal BereputasiWriting and Publishing in Reputable Journals

Enam sesi dari meja editor jurnal bereputasi: jurnal sebagai percakapan, anatomi desk rejection, argumen dan bukti arsip, empat bagian penentu nasib naskah, reviewer dan etika di era AI, serta klinik naskah hingga siap submit.Six sessions from the editor’s desk of a reputable journal: the journal as conversation, the anatomy of desk rejection, argument and archival evidence, the four sections that decide a manuscript’s fate, reviewers and ethics in the AI era, and a manuscript clinic through to submission.

6 sesisessions103 simpul petamap nodes8.9k kata per bahasawords per language24 soal ujiself-check items

Susunan sesiSession outline

Alur belajar dari fondasi hingga capstoneFrom foundations to capstone

P09-S1 · SesiSession 1

Jurnal sebagai Percakapan: Dari Gagasan ke KontribusiThe Journal as Conversation: From Idea to Contribution

Menemukan percakapan yang hidup di jurnal sasaran, membaca lintasan publikasi dua puluh tahun di arsip Pustaka, dan menulis pernyataan kontribusi yang dikenali editor pada menit pertamaLocating the living conversation in a target journal, reading a twenty-year publication trajectory in the Pustaka archive, and writing a contribution statement an editor recognises in the first minute

P09-S2 · SesiSession 2

Anatomi Desk Rejection: Pandangan dari Meja EditorThe Anatomy of Desk Rejection: A View from the Editor's Desk

Lingkup, kebaruan, metode, bahasa, dan etika sebagai penapis yang bekerja dalam sepuluh menit pertamaScope, novelty, method, language and ethics as filters that operate in the first ten minutes

P09-S3 · SesiSession 3

Argumen dan Bukti Arsip: Struktur Naskah yang KokohArgument and Archival Evidence: Building a Robust Manuscript Structure

IMRaD atau esai, tangga klaim–bukti, dan cara mengutip arsip beserta provenansnya secara jujurIMRaD or essay, the claim–evidence ladder, and how to cite archives honestly with their provenance

P09-S4 · SesiSession 4

Judul, Abstrak, Pendahuluan, dan Diskusi yang MeyakinkanTitles, Abstracts, Introductions and Discussions That Persuade

Empat bagian yang menentukan nasib naskah, dibaca dari meja penyaring dan ditopang desain metodologis yang dapat dipertahankanThe four sections that decide a manuscript's fate, read from the screening desk and anchored in a defensible methodological design

P09-S5 · SesiSession 5

Reviewer, Revisi, dan Etika Publikasi di Era AIReviewers, Revision and Publication Ethics in the AI Era

Membaca laporan reviewer sebagai argumen, menyusun surat tanggapan yang meyakinkan editor, dan menjaga integritas naskah dari AI, jurnal predator, dan rujukan fiktifReading reviewer reports as arguments, writing response letters that persuade editors, and guarding the manuscript's integrity against AI misuse, predatory venues and fabricated references

P09-S6 · SesiSession 6

Klinik Naskah: Dari Draf ke Submit (Capstone)The Manuscript Clinic: From Draft to Submission (Capstone)

Membaca naskah sendiri dengan mata editor dan reviewer, lalu merakit paket submisi yang sanggup bertahan di meja penyaringanReading your own manuscript through an editor's and a reviewer's eyes, then assembling a submission package that survives the screening desk

🔒

Materi peserta terdaftarRegistered participants only

Kurikulum ini terbuka setelah pendaftaran dan pembayaran dikonfirmasiThis curriculum opens once registration and payment are confirmed

Silakan masuk dengan akun peserta Anda. Belum terdaftar? Ajukan kelas melalui formulir Learning Pathways.Please sign in with your participant account. Not registered yet? Request a class through the Learning Pathways form.

Ekosistem KBA13KBA13 InsightKBA13 AcademyAcehnologiArsip & PustakaPeta Ekosistem →